Mark2017
Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 51
This was quite amusing:
Two perspectives on this, the laws are there for everyone’s safety, then again some may argue that people should be responsible for their own actions. Nanny state v applying laws.
I like the fact the even the Prime Minister is not above the law and the officers felt no way intimated to issue the fine.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...urnbull-fined-250-not-wearing-lifejacket.html
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...g-boat-on-sydney-harbour-20171229-h0bd87.html
Two perspectives on this, the laws are there for everyone’s safety, then again some may argue that people should be responsible for their own actions. Nanny state v applying laws.
I like the fact the even the Prime Minister is not above the law and the officers felt no way intimated to issue the fine.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...urnbull-fined-250-not-wearing-lifejacket.html
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...g-boat-on-sydney-harbour-20171229-h0bd87.html
