BPJS: new policy

Am I missing something here? From what I can make out, they're going to remove the current system that has classes 1 through 3 and replace it with... an unknown other. Is that right? The bottom half of the article just seemed to explain the current system...

That seems like it might be slightly problematic. Hospitals already have rooms that are set up to be "more private" (class 1) and they have rooms that are set up to be wards (class 3). I don't see how you can turn a private room into a ward when it is 3 m x 3 m. That means those rooms will definitely remain a different class... But, with no particular method of allocation? Ya' reckon we will just pay directly to upgrade the room? Anyone have a better understanding of this?
 
Yes, new policy for bpjs-patients ... all in one class together. But Allianz, AXA, Prudential, etc patients still have access to first class, meaning the VIP rooms.
 
Am I missing something here? From what I can make out, they're going to remove the current system that has classes 1 through 3 and replace it with... an unknown other. Is that right? The bottom half of the article just seemed to explain the current system...

That seems like it might be slightly problematic. Hospitals already have rooms that are set up to be "more private" (class 1) and they have rooms that are set up to be wards (class 3). I don't see how you can turn a private room into a ward when it is 3 m x 3 m. That means those rooms will definitely remain a different class... But, with no particular method of allocation? Ya' reckon we will just pay directly to upgrade the room?exp Anyone have a better understaneing of thi
The hospitals today convince the classes that the qualifying rooms are full so people upgrade and pay the difference. We are class 1 and prefer private rooms so pay the difference. With the new system, more people will be paying for more than one level of upgrade. Hospitals get the cash. Hospitals have been complaining for years that BPJS does not pay enough and this is one way the hospitals will get more.

While BPJS health is a good idea, like many programs and policies here, it is totally unthought out. If they would have put a plan in place that wasn't based on income and put plans in place where the recipient chose the level of care received and specific prices for each level, it would have been a more workable and financially more sound program.
 
The work group or -why not- the whole committee of the parliament can have a nice vacation … eh work trip to Europe where (for decades) in most countries a mandatory health insurance system exists.
 
I have BPJS, and pay the top bracket of RP. 150,000 a month. I used it to go to Siloam hospital to see skin doctors, to remove some cancerous spots. Everyone of the doctors, gave such a disappointing effort to help me, it was ridiculous. Some didn't even examine my body. They just sat at their desk, and gave me the so called consultation, and ineffective cream, and sent me on my way, with a recommendation to see another doctor. Out of four doctors, only one actually looked at my body. She acknowledged that my lesions were cancerous, but did nothing, except refer me to another doctor.
I attribute this to using BPJS, because this insurance corporation doesn't want to pay for quality care!

I finally went to Sanglah Wing International, and have been getting the cancer lesions removed. But I have to pay cash! Why Is it BPJS won't pay for this? I pay my monthly premium consistently. So now the post is saying they wont pay for a single room any more? After all this, it brings me to believe this insurance corporation is a scam, taking in millions of dollars worth of money, and providing inadequate care! Shame on them. Making profit over providing proper accommodation, doctors, and medicine, is an insult to the people of Indonesia!
 
I have BPJS, and pay the top bracket of RP. 150,000 a month. I used it to go to Siloam hospital to see skin doctors, to remove some cancerous spots. Everyone of the doctors, gave such a disappointing effort to help me, it was ridiculous. Some didn't even examine my body. They just sat at their desk, and gave me the so called consultation, and ineffective cream, and sent me on my way, with a recommendation to see another doctor. Out of four doctors, only one actually looked at my body. She acknowledged that my lesions were cancerous, but did nothing, except refer me to another doctor.
I attribute this to using BPJS, because this insurance corporation doesn't want to pay for quality care!

I finally went to Sanglah Wing International, and have been getting the cancer lesions removed. But I have to pay cash! Why Is it BPJS won't pay for this? I pay my monthly premium consistently. So now the post is saying they wont pay for a single room any more? After all this, it brings me to believe this insurance corporation is a scam, taking in millions of dollars worth of money, and providing inadequate care! Shame on them. Making profit over providing proper accommodation, doctors, and medicine, is an insult to the people of Indonesia!
Class 1 has been a shared room for quite some time now. As for profit, there is none as far as the government knows since they have to subsidize it by great amounts every year. From my observation the big culpret in money shortage are all the people visiting a doctor for little problems that really don't need a doctors visit but have to because BPJS will cover medication whereas they need to pay cash for them outside the system. For those that receive BPJS at no cost to them enjoy the privilege of they or their kids being seen by a medical professional.

BPJS needs a lot of work yet but I feel there is no one who really knows how to make into a successful program.
 
Am I missing something here? From what I can make out, they're going to remove the current system that has classes 1 through 3 and replace it with... an unknown other. Is that right? The bottom half of the article just seemed to explain the current system...

That seems like it might be slightly problematic. Hospitals already have rooms that are set up to be "more private" (class 1) and they have rooms that are set up to be wards (class 3). I don't see how you can turn a private room into a ward when it is 3 m x 3 m. That means those rooms will definitely remain a different class... But, with no particular method of allocation? Ya' reckon we will just pay directly to upgrade the room? Anyone have a better understanding of this?
That's correct. They are planning to eliminate the current classification system (e.g Class I, II, III) and replace it with what is called KRIS (Standard Inpatient Class), a universal class that will be implemented by July 1, 2025.

All patients will receive treatment in standardized patient rooms in hospitals, irrespectively how much premium they pay. These rooms will be semi-private, meeting standards such as a maximum number of beds per room, availability of bathrooms, and air conditioning.

The premium rates have not been decided yet. However, the principle remains the same: working individuals will pay more, subsidize the system by contributing a percentage of their salary, which is paid by the employer, with a small contribution from employees taken from their salaries.

This is still unclear, but I believe there might be an option for people to upgrade to better patient rooms, which would be up to the hospital to decide. If this is the case and is not regulated, left to the discretion of hospitals, there is a high risk of corruption, as hospitals could charge whatever they want such as must include the VIP treatment as part of the upgrade.
 
Last edited:
Class 1 has been a shared room for quite some time now. As for profit, there is none as far as the government knows since they have to subsidize it by great amounts every year. From my observation the big culpret in money shortage are all the people visiting a doctor for little problems that really don't need a doctors visit but have to because BPJS will cover medication whereas they need to pay cash for them outside the system. For those that receive BPJS at no cost to them enjoy the privilege of they or their kids being seen by a medical professional.

BPJS needs a lot of work yet but I feel there is no one who really knows how to make into a successful program.
I could write a book about my recent BPJS expereice and want to tell the story but it is just so long and complicated. The problems I see with BPJS are with the doctors and hosptials milking the system for every charge they can. If BPJS will pay for it, they will do it wheter you need it or not. They turned an outpatient procedure into 2 procedures and a 3 day hospital stay just becasue that was the max BPJS will pay. 6 doctor visits, prodecure done twice (once without proper antehesia so needed to be redone again before they could actaully do the small operation), 3 hospital visits full of tests and a 3 day hospital stay all for a standard prodecure that is handled as outpatient in 2 max visits in the rest of the world. If you question them they just say that's BPJS procedure but it really looks more like the hospital and doctors will look at what the max BPJS will pay and then make sure that it what happens. The government is actually a big loser in these cases.
 
I could write a book about my recent BPJS expereice and want to tell the story but it is just so long and complicated. The problems I see with BPJS are with the doctors and hosptials milking the system for every charge they can. If BPJS will pay for it, they will do it wheter you need it or not. They turned an outpatient procedure into 2 procedures and a 3 day hospital stay just becasue that was the max BPJS will pay. 6 doctor visits, prodecure done twice (once without proper antehesia so needed to be redone again before they could actaully do the small operation), 3 hospital visits full of tests and a 3 day hospital stay all for a standard prodecure that is handled as outpatient in 2 max visits in the rest of the world. If you question them they just say that's BPJS procedure but it really looks more like the hospital and doctors will look at what the max BPJS will pay and then make sure that it what happens. The government is actually a big loser in these cases.
Yes, this is my experience too. At that time I had a private insurance. Went to Siloam with high fever. They turned me inside out.

I wonder if those examinations with ct-scans etc ... will have a kick-back (read: money) into the pockets of the doctors? If so, it is a pervers system.
 
I wonder if those examinations with ct-scans etc ... will have a kick-back (read: money) into the pockets of the doctors? If so, it is a pervers system.
They abosuletly get money almost like a commission. I used think that the govenment was the probelm with BPJS but after my personal experiences it appears to be the doctors and hospitals that are actually to blame. Of couse the patient isn't anywhere in their thought process.
 
That's correct. They are planning to eliminate the current classification system (e.g Class I, II, III) and replace it with what is called KRIS (Standard Inpatient Class), a universal class that will be implemented by July 1, 2025.

All patients will receive treatment in standardized patient rooms in hospitals, irrespectively how much premium they pay. These rooms will be semi-private, meeting standards such as a maximum number of beds per room, availability of bathrooms, and air conditioning.

The premium rates have not been decided yet. However, the principle remains the same: working individuals will pay more, subsidize the system by contributing a percentage of their salary, which is paid by the employer, with a small contribution from employees taken from their salaries.

This is still unclear, but I believe there might be an option for people to upgrade to better patient rooms, which would be up to the hospital to decide. If this is the case and is not regulated, left to the discretion of hospitals, there is a high risk of corruption, as hospitals could charge whatever they want such as must include the VIP treatment as part of the upgrade.
If what you believe is true, then why should someone pay for a higher grade if they all will treated the same? Facts are much better than what you believe.
Health care and Education, should not be something for profit. It is a right of all people and the government should Provide this to all citizens, regardless of financial status! Isn't this one of the main reasons people pay taxes?
 
I could write a book about my recent BPJS expereice and want to tell the story but it is just so long and complicated. The problems I see with BPJS are with the doctors and hosptials milking the system for every charge they can. If BPJS will pay for it, they will do it wheter you need it or not. They turned an outpatient procedure into 2 procedures and a 3 day hospital stay just becasue that was the max BPJS will pay. 6 doctor visits, prodecure done twice (once without proper antehesia so needed to be redone again before they could actaully do the small operation), 3 hospital visits full of tests and a 3 day hospital stay all for a standard prodecure that is handled as outpatient in 2 max visits in the rest of the world. If you question them they just say that's BPJS procedure but it really looks more like the hospital and doctors will look at what the max BPJS will pay and then make sure that it what happens. The government is actually a big loser in these cases.

No wonder mothers now are having c-section instead of natural vaginal birth. Babies now are also being fed with highly expensive formulated milk made from cow's milk or goat's milk instead of their mother's breast milk (which is the best really). Once babies are born, doctors/nurses swarm their patients with promotions and educate them what brand of milk is "best" for their baby. I think the government should stop this malpractice.
 
No wonder mothers now are having c-section instead of natural vaginal birth. Babies now are also being fed with highly expensive formulated milk made from cow's milk or goat's milk instead of their mother's breast milk (which is the best really). Once babies are born, doctors/nurses swarm their patients with promotions and educate them what brand of milk is "best" for their baby. I think the government should stop this malpractice.
But this isn't exclusive to Indonesia. They wanna sell you a c-section in many other (western countries included) countries too. So much that the job "midwife" is a dying breed. At least that was my last state of knowledge.

For BPJS, personally I still can't say anything negative about it. Iam sure it needs optimization but I hear different stories. Doctors that do too much, because they get money. Then doctors who don't do enough cause they don't get enough money from it and complain that BPJS is very slow in paying the bills. 😅
So yeah, what is it now? BPJS or the doctors/hospitals?

So far I never felt under- or over treated. Everything was ok so far in the last 5 years.

About Shadrachs complaining, I would guess it doesn't have anything to do with BPJS but with the general quality of some doctors. They wouldn't be much better if you paid them more. It would even be more wasting money in the end.
 
But this isn't exclusive to Indonesia. They wanna sell you a c-section in many other (western countries included) countries too. So much that the job "midwife" is a dying breed. At least that was my last state of knowledge.

For BPJS, personally I still can't say anything negative about it. Iam sure it needs optimization but I hear different stories. Doctors that do too much, because they get money. Then doctors who don't do enough cause they don't get enough money from it and complain that BPJS is very slow in paying the bills. 😅
So yeah, what is it now? BPJS or the doctors/hospitals?

So far I never felt under- or over treated. Everything was ok so far in the last 5 years.

About Shadrachs complaining, I would guess it doesn't have anything to do with BPJS but with the general quality of some doctors. They wouldn't be much better if you paid them more. It would even be more wasting money in the end.
I was firmly in the beleif that the problems were all with the govenement until my long drawn out personal expereice but that is just not where the evidence points. If I shared the whole story, there would be doubt in your mind who is milking who. I will say that in the case with my heart attack that was handled by BPJS there were no obvious issues nor in my wife's case with a torn shoulder tendon. Which makes me wonder how often it does happen. I know it happens, I just can't say how often.

As far as C sections, yes that part is true as well but it's not just BPJS related. Many, many OBGYN's know it's a larger pay day and practically no one objects if they hint that it's a good option.
 
After birth, my child spent 2 months in the hospital waiting to get treatment for her congenital heart defect (not a BPJS problem, she was just too small for treatment with the methods available). Then, she spent another month or so total in the hospital before she died at the age of 10 months. I fully believe that the hospitals gave her the best treatments they had available. Perhaps she would have lived if she had been born in America... and I had the money to pay for treatment there.
But, I have ever had tens of thousands of dollars sitting in the bank and I don't think I'd have been able to get a loan for it, either. This whole tragic situation has left us owing nothing because BPJS covered it all (except for a room upgrade there at the beginning). Would I accept any cost, pay any price, to have her alive and well? Of course, but that was never an option. This was the best we could have hoped for and I am grateful for what we have been given.
I've met a few bizarre doctors who prescribed religious observance in leu of readily available medicine here (or the like), but they were never from BPJS. YMMV, but I love the existence of any form of national healthcare. If I can/want to pay a premium for a better room, that is fine. Otherwise, I just want to know I won't lose my family because I didn't win the lottery.
 
As far as C sections, yes that part is true as well but it's not just BPJS related. Many, many OBGYN's know it's a larger pay day and practically no one objects if they hint that it's a good option.
Yes - for the medical team its handy - they control the timing of the surgery rather than the baby/ mother deciding. A friend here is pretty certain the reason they were pressed into C-section is that it was a Friday and their Dr didnt want to work late. The lady is a yoga instructor and the damage to her abdominal muscles has impacted her significantly (and 2nd child also needed to be C-sectioned due to the first one being done that way).
 
Today in the news ...

Only in the Netherlands
The Maastricht UMC+ is the only center in the Netherlands with a permit for genetic analysis of the embryos for PGT, a pre-implantation genetic test. Parents who are at risk for a child with a serious hereditary disorder or on repeated miscarriages can opt for such a test due to chromosome abnormalities. This is also called embryo selection. It is an IVF treatment in which embryos are investigated for well-known genetic abnormalities, and only embryos are placed in the womb without the deviation.
 
Yes - for the medical team its handy - they control the timing of the surgery rather than the baby/ mother deciding. A friend here is pretty certain the reason they were pressed into C-section is that it was a Friday and their Dr didnt want to work late. The lady is a yoga instructor and the damage to her abdominal muscles has impacted her significantly (and 2nd child also needed to be C-sectioned due to the first one being done that way).
Forty years ago, producing occasional reports for a national ABC health program in Australia I recall a story that suggested many women were pressed to have caesarians as their doctors were playing golf over the weekend and did not want to be disturbed from their games. It seems that it is a commonplace around the world where doctors' convenience plays a greater role than patient welfare.
1725347289238.png
 
In The Netherlands doctors don't recommend having caesarians. Too many risks ... also moving around the colon is not a good thing ... researchers say.
 

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Follow Us

Latest Expat Indo Articles

Latest Tweets by Expat Indo

Latest Activity

Online Now

Newest Members

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,598
Messages
110,926
Members
3,882
Latest member
Jordan437
Back
Top Bottom